Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 score. Galaxy Note9's construction is noticeably older, somewhat heavier and thicker than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels quantity in each inch in the display and a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy Note9 has a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note9 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting images in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a way larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.