Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's general score of 83.4. The Galaxy Note9 is a incredibly older, just a bit thicker and a little heavier device than Motorola Edge 40 Pro. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a bit better display than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a just a little lower screen density and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photos or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a way larger back camera sensor and a lot higher video quality.
Galaxy Note9 features a little bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 15% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.