Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's global score of 81.9. Even being the best we are comparing, the Galaxy Note9 is a incredibly older, just a little thicker and heavier phone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better display than Galaxy Note9, although it has a just a bit lower number of pixels per inch in the display and a little bit lower 1256 x 2760 resolution, they both have a screen of the same size. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is worse for taking photographs or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4310mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.