Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 general score. The Galaxy Note9 body is noticeably older, just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. The Galaxy Note9 features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch and a way worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.