Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G200 5G's overall score of 86.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 body has the same thickness than Motorola Moto G200 5G, but it's a little bit lighter. The Galaxy Note9 has a bit more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit better performance than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Moto G200 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking images and videos in poorly lited situations and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a way higher 108 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Moto G200 5G has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.