Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is better than Moto G51 5G's general score of 77.8. The Galaxy Note9 design is a little thinner and a little bit lighter than Moto G51 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has just a little better hardware performance than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note9 has just a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960px resolution and a higher pixel count in each inch in the screen. Galaxy Note9 has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy Note9 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto G51 5G counts with improved battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Moto G51 5G shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G51 5G also counts with better video frame rate and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.