Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G60, having an 87.1 score against 79.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note9 is older than Motorola Moto G60, it's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. The Galaxy Note9 has just a bit better display than Moto G60, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a little bit better memory for applications and games than Moto G60, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G60, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G60 has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity. Moto G60 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G60 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.