Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Moto G60s's global score of 79.9. Galaxy Note9's design is just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Moto G60s. The Galaxy Note9 features a little faster CPU than Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and more pixels per inch of display. Motorola Moto G60s has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G60s also counts with a back camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Moto G60s features a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G60s also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G60s features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.