Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is a bit better than Moto G71 5G, with an 87.1 score against 82.9. Galaxy Note9 is better than Moto G71 5G, we must tell that it's also a noticeably older, just a bit thicker and heavier cellphone. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G71 5G. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy Note9 features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy Note9 also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a greater pixel density. Motorola Moto G71 5G takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G71 5G also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy Note9 features a much greater storage for games and applications than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy Note9 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G71 5G features better battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.