Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is better than Moto G9 Power, with a general score of 87.1 against 78.6. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is an extremely older cellphone than Moto G9 Power, but Samsung was able to build it just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter. The Galaxy Note9 has just a bit better performance than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note9 counts with an incredibly better screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a way higher display pixels density. The Motorola Moto G9 Power's memory for apps and games is just as good as the Galaxy Note9 one, they have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal memory.
Moto G9 Power captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G9 Power also counts with a lot higher resolution camera.
Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.