Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-08-24 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 global score. The Galaxy Note9 design is much newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a bit better processing unit than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a slightly better looking display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a larger display. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a little bit better camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 12 MP resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.