Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, having a general score of 87.1 against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a just a little heavier device than the Motorola One Hyper, but both have the same thickness. Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2960px resolution. Motorola One Hyper captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures and video and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a much more megapixels camera.
The Motorola One Hyper features a little bit more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper features a battery duration that is just as good as Galaxy Note9's battery lifetime.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 costs more money than Motorola One Hyper, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.