Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-08-24 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is a bit better than Motorola One Vision, with a score of 87.1 against 80.7. Although Galaxy Note9 is a better cellphone than the Motorola One Vision, it must be told that it's also a just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Vision, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px, a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bigger display.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note9 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola One Vision counts with as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy Note9, both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note9 features a little better battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The Motorola One Vision features a superior camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.