Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is a little bit better than the Motorola razr (2020), with a global score of 87.1 against 87. Galaxy Note9's body is noticeably older, thicker and a little heavier than the Motorola razr (2020). The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a brighter screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px, a quite larger display and a better pixels number in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has just a bit better performance than Motorola razr (2020), although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy Note9 has a really longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a way bigger camera sensor taking way better quality pictures.
Galaxy Note9 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.