Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2022)'s 81.1 score. Even being the best phone we compare here, Samsung Galaxy Note9's construction is notably older, just a little heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola razr (2022). Motorola razr (2022) has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a greater number of pixels per display inch. Motorola razr (2022) counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy Note9 has just a little better battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 14 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.