Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 514 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with an 87.1 score against 79.2. Galaxy Note9 has an incredibly better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note9 has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.