Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2, having an 87.1 score against 79.7. Even being the best phone in this review, Galaxy Note9's construction is older, a little heavier and somewhat thicker than the OPPO Find X2. The OPPO Find X2 has a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note9, because it has a just a bit greater pixel density, a little higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a little bit larger display.
OPPO Find X2 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has 6 GB more RAM. Galaxy Note9 has a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The OPPO Find X2 features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh. The OPPO Find X2 features a superior camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a lot bigger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.