Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, with an 87.1 score against 77.7. The Galaxy Note9 body is older, somewhat heavier and thicker than OPPO Find X2 Neo. Galaxy Note9 has a bit superior processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a camera with a much better resolution and a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Galaxy Note9 has a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a battery life that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note9's battery lifetime, although the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a 1% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.