Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's general score of 83.1. The Galaxy Note9 design has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but it's just a little bit lighter. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a little larger display, a quite better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution and a quite better pixel count per screen inch. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 7% more battery size. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.