Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo's global score of 76. Even being the best we are comparing here, it must be told that it is also a way older, a little heavier and thicker cellphone. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a little better processing power than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The OPPO Find X3 Neo captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a little bit more storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note9 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.