Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's overall score of 77. Samsung Galaxy Note9's body is heavier and thicker than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little better performance than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a bit lower screen density and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bigger screen. The Galaxy Note9 features slightly more memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Galaxy Note9 features a way better battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.