Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A13 5G's general score of 82.1. Samsung Galaxy Note9's design has the same thickness than Galaxy A13 5G, but it is a bit heavier. The Galaxy Note9 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a much higher display density.
The Galaxy Note9 has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A13 5G features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.