Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is better than Galaxy A15 5G, with a general score of 87.1 against 77.4. The Galaxy Note9 is a older, a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than the Galaxy A15 5G. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a really superior processing power than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a higher pixels amount per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a bit more storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has better battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.