Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, with an 87.1 score against 84.6. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, but it is a bit lighter. Galaxy Note9 features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel number per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy Note9 has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A22 5G has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.