Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, getting a general score of 87.1 against 79.9. Although it's the best cellphone in this review, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 design is notably older, a bit heavier and a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a way better performance than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a little bit inferior quantity of pixels per display inch and a lot worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture, lower video frame rates and a tinier sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot better resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has superior battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.