Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G, with a overall score of 87.1 against 79.4. Samsung Galaxy Note9's body is just a little lighter than Galaxy A35 5G, although it is a bit thicker and was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features an extremely better CPU than Galaxy A35 5G. They have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a higher pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features improved battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh. Galaxy A35 5G features a better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting images and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way higher 50 MP resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor shooting way better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.