Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note9, having a overall score of 91.1 against 87.1. The Samsung Galaxy A52s body is extremely newer, just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy Note9. Galaxy Note9 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52s. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note9 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Galaxy A52s features a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a much higher 64 MP resolution back camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.