Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-08-24 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a general score of 87.1 against 76.9. Even being the best phone we compare here, it must be noted that it's also thicker and a little heavier. Galaxy Note9 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A70. They have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A70 features as much storage for apps and games as Galaxy Note9, both have a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a larger camera aperture, better video frame rate and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.