Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 514 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note9, having a 92.9 score against 87.1. The Galaxy A71 5G UW design is newer, just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Note9. Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a much bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy Note9, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.