Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-08-24 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | -- |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A73 5G's overall score of 80.5. Despite being the best in this review, the Galaxy Note9 is a thicker and somewhat heavier device than the Galaxy A73 5G. Galaxy Note9 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A73 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A73 5G. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. Samsung Galaxy A73 5G captures a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back camera with lot more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G features just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A73 5G features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.