Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | -- |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F23, having a overall score of 87.1 against 84.6. Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit better display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy Note9 features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy F23, because although it has a way lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy Note9 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy F23, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note9 also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy F23 features improved battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.