Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 514 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note9, getting an 88.1 score against 87.1. The Galaxy F62 body is incredibly newer than Samsung Galaxy Note9's, but it is just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker. Galaxy Note9 features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a better screen pixels density.
Galaxy Note9 features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy Note9 also has a larger number of cores (and faster). Galaxy F62 features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited situations and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.