Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2022-07-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G52 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M13, getting a general score of 87.1 against 81.1. Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a much older, just a little thicker and a little bit heavier device than Samsung Galaxy M13. Galaxy M13 has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M13, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher pixels quantity per inch in the display. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy M13, because although it has a lot less MP resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a much bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M13, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M13 has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.