Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2022-04-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M53 5G's global score of 76.7. Despite being the best in our current comparison, we must note that it's also incredibly older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy Note9 features a sharper screen than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels amount in each inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a much better performance than Galaxy M53 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy M53 5G captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a much smaller camera sensor offering a much worse image quality and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot more MP back camera.
Galaxy Note9 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy Note9 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy M53 5G features better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.