Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note9, getting a 93.4 score against 87.1. The Galaxy S22 design is incredibly newer, thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy Note9. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S22, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S22 features a brighter display than Galaxy Note9, although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a just a little worse screen pixel density and a little smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy S22 captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera, a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has an 8% bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy Note9. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note9, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.