Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-24 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE's global score of 76. Samsung Galaxy Note9's construction is somewhat thicker but just a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a lot lower pixels count per inch of screen and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little larger screen.
Galaxy Note9 features a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and faster). Galaxy Note9 counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note9 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has an 18% greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy Note9 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.