Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is better than Galaxy S5 Sport's overall score of 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 body has the same thickness than Galaxy S5 Sport, but it is noticeably heavier. The Galaxy S5 Sport has a little sharper display than Galaxy Note9, although it has a lot smaller screen, a just a little lower amount of pixels per inch in the display and a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and 112 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy Note9 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a lot less MP resolution camera and a worse video quality, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and video.
The Galaxy Note9 has a very superior battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy Note9 costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.