Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-08-24 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 514 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. The Galaxy Note9 is an older device than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but Samsung made it much thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note9 features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note9 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy Note9 has a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, a F1.5 aperture and a same size camera sensor, the Galaxy Note9 also has a much higher video quality.
Galaxy Note9 features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy Note9 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Galaxy Note9 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.