Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.32 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Lemon Green, Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali G615-MC6 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is slightly better than the Xiaomi 14T, getting an 87.1 score against 83.7. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Galaxy Note9's design is extremely older, thicker and just a little heavier than the Xiaomi 14T. The Xiaomi 14T features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a little lower pixel density and a little bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2712, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
Galaxy Note9 features a little bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi 14T, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Note9 features an extremely better CPU than Xiaomi 14T, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Xiaomi 14T has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi 14T also counts with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera and a way bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi 14T features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.