Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is slightly better than Xiaomi 14T Pro, getting an 87.1 score against 84.5. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy Note9 is extremely older and a bit thicker than Xiaomi 14T Pro, it's construction is still a little bit lighter. Galaxy Note9 features a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a much better display than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a bit lower 1220 x 2712 resolution and a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a little bigger display. The Xiaomi 14T Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light images and videos, it also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels, a way better video quality and a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.