Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is much better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, with a score of 87.1 against 78.7. Galaxy Note9 is a just a bit lighter phone than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, but they are equally thin. Galaxy Note9 has a little bit better display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
The Galaxy Note9 has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has much more storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro captures a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting images and videos in low light situations and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has superior battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.