Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 global score. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy Note9 is extremely older and just a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, it's construction is still just a little thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.