Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | -- |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's 77.1 overall score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per inch of display and a lot worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has much more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a much better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has superior battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.