Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | -- |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, having a general score of 87.1 against 83.1. Galaxy Note9 features a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1220 x 2710px and a bit worse display density, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way higher 200 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note9, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 28 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.