Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-16 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 general score. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S10 5G has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Galaxy S10 5G is a extremely newer phone than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it is thicker and a little bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit larger screen, more pixels per inch of screen and a much better 1440 x 3040 resolution.
Galaxy S10 5G features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy S10 5G features a superior camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a camera with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.