Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-16 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Galaxy M30s, having a 93.6 score against 83.3. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's design is somewhat thinner but just a little heavier than Galaxy M30s, and both were released with only a few months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy M30s, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels, a just a bit higher display density and a little bit bigger screen. Galaxy S10 5G features a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M30s takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate and a much tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing much better quality photos and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.