Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is much better than Motorola Edge 50's general score of 81.2. Even being the best we are comparing, we must tell that it's also an extremely older, just a little thicker and a bit heavier cellphone. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bit greater screen density and a quite better resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a greater memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50. Both have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite shoots clearer videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, a way smaller back-facing camera sensor, a worse 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a lower (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.