Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 279.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Despite of the fact Galaxy S10 Lite is noticeably older and noticeably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a bigger display, a bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the display and a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a much powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a better resolution camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture and a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.