Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is much better than the Google Nexus 6P, with a overall score of 88.3 against 80.3. The Galaxy S10 is a extremely newer and lighter phone than Google Nexus 6P, but it's just a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit better looking display than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a just a little greater number of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
The Galaxy S10 features a bit superior processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 5 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S10 features a slightly better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a lower video resolution, a less MP back facing camera and a smaller back camera sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, it also counts with a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Google Nexus 6P has just a little better battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 1% bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy S10 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.