Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Both devices we compare here have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S10 has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy S10 is a noticeably older and noticeably thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung made it lighter anyway.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a really bigger display and a slightly higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a way more MP back camera.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 68 percent larger battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.